Controlling the (impact of) the weather

Controlling the (impact of) the weather

There is an ever-increasing focus on climate change and corresponding changes to rainfall patterns. It seems like more extreme rainfall events are observed every year. Wisconsin and Minnesota Discovery Farms Programs have monitored 127 site years of edge-of-field surface runoff. During these site years, 2,184 surface runoff events were measured. These runoff events and the corresponding rainfall data were analyzed to answer the following questions:

  • Are a large portion of nutrient and soil losses driven by extreme rainfall events?
  • Can you control the weather (or the impact of it) on your crop fields?

Most nutrient and soil losses happened in a limited number of runoff events.
The majority of the nutrient and soil losses happened in about 200 of the 2,184 runoff events. The top 10% of surface runoff events accounted for 46% of the total runoff, 59% of the total nitrogen, 65% of the total phosphorus, and 80% of the total soil lost throughout the entire dataset.  

Most runoff events took place during storms of an ‘expected’ size, not extreme events.
All the surface runoff events were paired with rainfall data, including depth, duration, intensity, and maximum 5, 10, 30 and 60-minute intensities. Intensity data was then compared with NOAA data from each location to define rainfall return periods for each runoff event.

A rainfall return period is an estimate of the likelihood of a rainfall event to occur. In general, as the return period increases, so does the rainfall or rainfall intensity.  

Out of 2,184 total runoff events from 127 site years of data, there were 375 runoff events with a rainfall return period greater than one year. There were 11 runoff events with a rainfall return period of greater than 25 years and four with a rainfall return period estimated to be greater than 1,000 years. 

Extreme rainfall events did not significantly impact edge-of-field nutrient losses. 70-75% of surface runoff, total phosphorus, and total nitrogen losses were NOT driven by extreme rainfall.
Most of the surface runoff, total phosphorus, and total nitrogen losses were from surface runoff events that had rainfall return periods of less than one year (see blue bar on graph). This means these runoff events resulted from common rainfall events or snowmelt. However, over 50% of the soil loss happened with runoff events with a rainfall return period greater than one year. Extreme rainfall events had more of an impact on soil loss. 

Often a 25-year rainfall event is used as design criterion for conservation practices in agricultural fields. Surface runoff with a rainfall return period of greater than 25 years had very little influence (1 to 2%) on surface runoff losses in this dataset. This could be a result of effective conservation practices designed to withstand larger rainfall events or the relatively few 25-year rainfall events that have been monitored. In fact, only 11 surface runoff events had a rainfall return period greater than 25 years.

Snowmelt is still a significant part of the water budget and decreases the influence of extreme rainfall events in Wisconsin and Minnesota.
Over half of the surface runoff measured in Minnesota and Wisconsin occurred during frozen soils and snowmelt conditions. This is an important period for runoff in the Upper Midwest. This period is also important for phosphorus and nitrogen movement. However, soil movement is limited during snowmelt. The amount of snowmelt runoff and nutrient losses diminishes the impact of extreme rainfall events. If runoff and nutrient loss occurring with snowmelt decreases, it would likely increase the influence of extreme rainfall events.

 Additional takeaways to consider from this analysis:
Timing of extreme rainfall events matter. If extreme events occur earlier in the year it would likely increase their impact on surface runoff.
There is a need for a site-by-site assessment to explore differences by region, soil type and level of
conservation practices.